Official scoring guide
California CAASPP (SBAC) Grades 3–8 3 scoring criteria Analytic rubric 10 pts total

SBAC Narrative Performance Task Writing Rubric, Grades 3–8

Complete scoring guide for the SBAC Narrative Performance Task writing rubric used by California CAASPP, Grades 3 to 8. All three traits, every score point, every descriptor extracted verbatim from the Smarter Balanced June 2023 rubrics. Point of view scoring begins at Grade 7.

Verified against official source Last updated May 2026
01 Overview

What this rubric measures

The SBAC Narrative Performance Task Writing Rubric, Grades 3–8 is the official scoring guide used to evaluate student writing on California CAASPP (SBAC) assessments. It is an Analytic rubric that scores responses across 3 distinct criteria, allowing teachers to give precise, targeted feedback on each area of writing.

02 Full rubric

All 3 scoring criteria

Click any criterion to expand its score level descriptors. The language below is taken verbatim from the official California Department of Education CAASPP (SBAC) scoring guide.

1
Organization/Purpose
1-4 pts
4 pts Fully sustained organization, clear focus

The organization of the narrative, real or imagined, is fully sustained and the focus is clear and maintained throughout:

  • an effective plot helps to create a sense of unity and completeness
  • effectively establishes a setting, narrator/characters, and/or point of view (Grade 7+)
  • consistent use of a variety of transitional strategies to clarify the relationships between and among ideas; strong connection between and among ideas
  • natural, logical sequence of events from beginning to end
  • effective opening and closure for audience and purpose
3 pts Adequately sustained organization, generally maintained focus

The organization of the narrative, real or imagined, is adequately sustained, and the focus is adequate and generally maintained:

  • an evident plot helps to create a sense of unity and completeness, though there may be minor flaws and some ideas may be loosely connected
  • adequately establishes a setting, narrator/characters, and/or point of view (Grade 7+)
  • adequate use of a variety of transitional strategies to clarify the relationships between and among ideas
  • adequate sequence of events from beginning to end
  • adequate opening and closure for audience and purpose
2 pts Somewhat sustained, uneven focus

The organization of the narrative, real or imagined, is somewhat sustained and may have an uneven focus:

  • there may be an inconsistent plot, and/or flaws may be evident
  • unevenly or minimally establishes a setting, narrator/characters, and/or point of view (Grade 7+)
  • uneven use of appropriate transitional strategies and/or little variety
  • weak or uneven sequence of events
  • opening and closure, if present, are weak
1 pt Maintained but little or no focus

The organization of the narrative, real or imagined, may be maintained but may provide little or no focus:

  • there is little or no discernible plot or there may just be a series of events
  • may be brief or there is little to no attempt to establish a setting, narrator/characters, and/or point of view (Grade 7+)
  • few or no appropriate transitional strategies may be evident and may cause confusion
  • little or no organization of an event sequence; frequent extraneous ideas and/or a major drift may be evident
  • opening and/or closure may be missing or unsatisfactory

Point of view scoring begins at grade 7. At Grades 3-6, the rubric asks the response to establish a setting and narrator/characters; the point-of-view bullet does not apply.

2
Development/Elaboration
1-4 pts
4 pts Thorough, effective elaboration

The narrative, real or imagined, provides thorough, effective elaboration using relevant details, dialogue, and/or description:

  • experiences, characters, setting and/or events are clearly developed
  • connections to source materials may enhance the narrative
  • effective use of a variety of narrative techniques that advance the story or illustrate the experience
  • effective use of sensory, concrete, and figurative language that clearly advances the purpose
  • effective, appropriate style enhances the narration
3 pts Adequate elaboration

The narrative, real or imagined, provides adequate elaboration using details, dialogue, and/or description:

  • experiences, characters, setting, and/or events are adequately developed
  • connections to source materials may contribute to the narrative
  • adequate use of a variety of narrative techniques that generally advance the story or illustrate the experience
  • adequate use of sensory, concrete, and figurative language that generally advances the purpose
  • generally appropriate style is evident
2 pts Uneven, cursory elaboration

The narrative, real or imagined, provides uneven, cursory elaboration using partial and uneven details, dialogue, and/or description:

  • experiences, characters, setting, and/or events are unevenly developed
  • connections to source materials may be ineffective, awkward, or vague but do not interfere with the narrative
  • narrative techniques are uneven and inconsistent
  • partial or weak use of sensory, concrete, and figurative language that may not advance the purpose
  • inconsistent or weak attempt to create appropriate style
1 pt Minimal elaboration

The narrative, real or imagined, provides minimal elaboration using few or no details, dialogue, and/or description:

  • experiences, characters, setting, and/or events may be vague, lack clarity, or confusing
  • connections to source materials, if evident, may detract from the narrative
  • use of narrative techniques may be minimal, absent, incorrect, or irrelevant
  • may have little or no use of sensory, concrete, or figurative language; language does not advance and may interfere with the purpose
  • little or no evidence of appropriate style

Development/Elaboration on Narrative covers plot details, character/setting development, dialogue, sensory and figurative language, and narrative techniques. Source material is optional, when present, it may enhance the narrative.

3
Conventions
0-2 pts
2 pts Adequate command of conventions

The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions:

  • adequate use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage, and spelling
1 pt Partial command of conventions

The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions:

  • limited use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage, and spelling
0 pts Little or no command of conventions

The response demonstrates little or no command of conventions:

  • infrequent use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage, and spelling

Holistic scoring considers Variety (range of error types), Severity (basic errors weighted more heavily than higher-level errors), and Density (proportion of errors to amount of writing done well).

03 How to score

How to score with the SBAC Narrative Performance Task Writing Rubric, Grades 3–8.

A practical guide for teachers and norming teams. How to apply each descriptor consistently, the pitfalls that hurt inter-rater reliability, and a workflow for calibrating with colleagues.

01

Three-trait analytic, scored independently

  • Score Organization/Purpose (1 to 4) and Development/Elaboration (1 to 4), then Conventions (0 to 2). Sum for the rubric total out of 10.
  • On Narrative, the second trait is Development/Elaboration (not Evidence/Elaboration) because narrative writing does not center on source-based evidence.
  • Each trait is scored independently.
02

Plot and elaboration are the heart of the score

  • Narrative scoring focuses on plot, setting, character, sequence of events, sensory and figurative language, and narrative techniques.
  • Source material is optional on Narrative. When present, it may enhance the narrative; it is not required for the top score.
  • Point of view is a top-score expectation only from Grade 7 onward.
03

Holistic Conventions scoring

  • Variety: count error types across sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage, and spelling.
  • Severity: basic errors weigh more than higher-level errors.
  • Density: the ratio of errors to length matters more than the raw count.
04

Tips for norming with your team

  • Anchor with 3 to 5 sample responses scored by your most experienced grader before the session.
  • Score the first 5 silently, then compare. Discuss any trait where graders are more than one point apart.
  • Re-norm halfway through a long batch. Drift is real, especially across genres.
Rubric-specific guidance

Notes for the SBAC Narrative Performance Task Rubric, Grades 3–8

The SBAC Narrative rubric is the only one of the five that uses Development/Elaboration as its second trait (not Evidence/Elaboration). It scores responses that tell a real or imagined story with plot, characters, setting, and a clear sequence of events.

The Narrative rubric is the only SBAC writing rubric that spans Grades 3 through 8 in a single document. From Grade 7 onward, the rubric adds 'point of view' to the setting and narrator/characters expectations on Organization/Purpose. Grade 3 through Grade 6 responses are not scored on point of view.

Source material is optional on Narrative. Some Performance Task prompts ask students to extend a passage they have read; in that case the rubric notes that 'connections to source materials may enhance the narrative.' Source connections are not required for any score level.

Conventions is scored holistically using Variety, Severity, and Density. The descriptors are identical across all SBAC writing rubrics.

04 See it in action

See this rubric in action.

EnlightenAI scores student writing on this exact rubric, with per-criterion feedback that mirrors how you grade by hand. The sample response below shows how the rubric applies to a real piece of student writing, scored against every criterion.

05 Why EnlightenAI

Score this rubric consistently, with the feedback students actually use

EnlightenAI is trained on your standards and your exemplars, then scores at the speed of your classroom.

Trained on your rubric

Upload this rubric, or any custom one, and the AI learns your exact criteria, descriptor language, and score level boundaries.

Per-criterion feedback

Students receive specific, actionable comments tied to each criterion, exactly the way you'd grade by hand.

Built for K–12 schools

Roster sync, FERPA-aligned data handling, and per-school configuration so every campus uses the same standards.

06 Frequently asked

About the SBAC Narrative Performance Task Writing Rubric, Grades 3–8

What is the SBAC Narrative Performance Task Writing Rubric for Grades 3 to 8?
It is the official Smarter Balanced scoring rubric for narrative responses on the Performance Task portion of CAASPP and other SBAC consortium assessments. The rubric is analytic with three traits, Organization/Purpose (1 to 4), Development/Elaboration (1 to 4), and Conventions (0 to 2), for a total of 10 possible points. The current rubric was last updated June 2023.
How is the Narrative rubric different from the other four SBAC rubrics?
Two ways. First, the second trait is Development/Elaboration (not Evidence/Elaboration) because narrative writing does not center on source-based evidence. The descriptors cover plot, characters, sensory language, and narrative techniques. Second, source material is optional on Narrative, where it is required on the other four rubrics.
When does the rubric start expecting point of view?
Grade 7. The Organization/Purpose trait includes a bullet about establishing "a setting, narrator/characters, and/or point of view." A footnote explicitly says "point of view begins at grade 7." Grade 3 through Grade 6 responses are not scored on point of view.
Can a narrative response score 4 without using source material?
Yes. The rubric notes that "connections to source materials may enhance the narrative," which is permissive language. Many Narrative prompts provide a starter passage; using it can strengthen a response but is not required for any score level.
Is this rubric the official version from the California Department of Education?
Yes. The descriptor language on this page is extracted verbatim from the official SBAC Performance Task Writing Rubric for Narrative writing (Grades 3 to 8), last updated June 2023 and used by California CAASPP. We do not edit, paraphrase, or interpret the criteria.
Where can I find the source document?
The official SBAC rubrics used by California CAASPP are published at caaspp-elpac.org.
Can EnlightenAI score student narrative writing using this rubric?
Yes. Upload this rubric, provide a few teacher-scored exemplars, and EnlightenAI will score new student narratives on every trait with per-trait feedback that mirrors the SBAC descriptors.

Use this rubric in EnlightenAI

Train EnlightenAI on the SBAC Narrative Performance Task Rubric for Grades 3 to 8 and start scoring student narratives, with consistent per-trait feedback, in a single class period.